About EKOS Politics

We launched this website in order to showcase our election research, and our suite of polling technologies including Probit and IVR. We will be updating this site frequently with new polls, analysis and insight into Canadian politics. EKOS's experience, knowledge and sophisticated research designs have contributed positively to many previous elections.

Other EKOS Products

In addition to current political analysis, EKOS also makes available to the public general research of interest, including research in evaluation, general public domain research, as well as a full history of EKOS press releases.

Media Inquires

For media inquires, please contact: Frank Graves President EKOS Research Associates t: 613.235-7215 [email protected]

A Study of the Incidence and Effects of Misleading Calls in the 41st National Election – April 24, 2012

Summary:

This study has presented evidence which strongly suggests that in the subject ridings there was a targeted program of voter suppression in place. It was reported to be administered to tens of thousands of electors based on these samples.

These activities were clearly targeted at non-Conservative voters in a highly improbable manner. They included erroneous reports of false voting station changes and faux calls ostensibly coming from Elections Canada. In reality, there were no calls from Elections Canada and there were virtually no voting station changes, yet many thousands of voters in these seven ridings claimed to have received these calls.

If these responses were the constructions of disgruntled non-Conservative voters, one cannot explain why the same targeting effects were not present in the comparison group.

Exposure to these calls clearly had a dampening effect on the propensity for non-Conservative supporters to vote. Using different methods, we would estimate the effect in the range of 1.2 per cent to 1.8 per cent. Applying a margin of error to those estimates would produce a band of 0.8 per cent to 2.2 per cent. In other words, if these actions had not been in place, the Conservative advantage would have been reduced by this amount on average in those seven ridings.

The incidence of these misleading calls may have been overstated due to memory and other errors, but the incidence of non-voting is also most likely understated by a larger amount. These impacts also reflect the widespread presence of other intimidating and misleading calls which were reported by nearly 10 per cent of all respondents in the seven ridings (0.4 per cent effect). It is also notable that there is evidence that these kinds of inappropriate and illicit calls were fairly ubiquitous to all of the areas studied, even the comparison group.

This study was done within strict time constraints and it has recognized limitations. While more time and resources would provide a more refined understanding of the extent and effects of voter suppression activities in 41st Federal Election – the most plausible interpretation of the evidence and tests presented here is that voters in the subject ridings were exposed to a program of voter suppression which was targeted and effective.

Click here for the full report: A Study of the Incidence and Effects of Misleading Calls in the 41st National Election (April 24, 2012)

Click here for the data tables: Data Tables (Subject Group), Data Tables (Comparison Group)

2 comments to A Study of the Incidence and Effects of Misleading Calls in the 41st National Election – April 24, 2012

  • joe

    Voting now Liberal or NDP preferablly Liberal

  • “restricting abortion, baninng gay marriage, cuts to health care funding (including privatization)”Robert if you look at his past comments and writings these are all things Harper supports. ” In most cases, he’s done the opposite.”I would like a citation of Harper being an advocate for gay marriage and a woman’s right to choose.”As for tax cuts, is the gap between “excessive” and “progressive” really just 1.5%?”No but cutting already low corporate tax rates surely isn’t progressive.”Given Canada’s peace-keeping efforts, and its work protecting the most impoverished nations and most vulnerable environments, wouldn’t defense spending be considered progressive?”To say 30 Billion dollar fighter jets are not the best investment for peacekeeping would be an understatement. How about investing in ground troops trained for peacekeeping or disaster response? In either case I would rather see the bulk of that money invested into infrastructure or education.”And ethical abuses and corruption are neither progressive or non-progressive.”Conceded, though attacking democratic institutions and refusing to take media questions is something I would consider unprogressive”Even if I were convinced that giving a farmer extra paperwork and bills because of a gun crime in a city far away is somehow progressive, it wouldn’t cause beads of sweat to appear on my brow.I’ll admit that cuts to planned parenthood and delegating funding for cultural events to provincial or municipal jurisdictions isn’t progressive, but I’m not sweating until an actual key social program is cut, or key right removed. Are you? Really?”If Harper’s behavior in government doesn’t make you sweat then you and I have very different ideas of what kind of country Canada should be. Not that there is anything wrong with that.